Hi @CloudGod , I’m the Product Manager for Event Portal, and wanted to thank-you for taking the time to capture and let us know your feedback. I agree this feature set is a big step forward for Event Portal in terms modeling and governance of EDAs. We plan to leverage it for configuration management and audits in future. I appreciate all feedback, and really like your suggestions for usability enhancements as well.
Related to your first one, at some point we want to implement a design validation capability that when triggered it would flag all aspects of the design that are not complete or that still need attention. This, for example, would flag events that are subscribed to by an application but only manual and not via a “Client Deliver Endpoint” with an associated subscription, or an event without an associated Logical Event Mesh…both valid states when initially ‘whiteboarding’ an architecture, but not detailed enough the final design. The associated objects will get flagged graphically in the UI and be displayed in a list too. This would be a great place to also display these manually marked applications as other items to follow-up on.
I also agree with need to add a lot more flexibility in terms of topic address and subscription editing. I’m sure you’ll come up a few other suggestions once you have time to get your hands on it.
We plan to continue to improve the overall user experience along with delivering new features as the product matures, so thanks again for the comments and keep the feedback coming.
Darryl