🎄 Happy Holidays! 🥳

Most of Solace is closed December 24–January 1 so our employees can spend time with their families. We will re-open Thursday, January 2, 2024. Please expect slower response times during this period and open a support ticket for anything needing immediate assistance.

Happy Holidays!

Please note: most of Solace is closed December 25–January 2, and will re-open Tuesday, January 3, 2023.

VPN Bridges and JMS request/response with direct messaging

Harald Hengelbrock
Harald Hengelbrock Member Posts: 1 ✭
in General Discussions #1

Hello,
I have problems configuring a VPN bridge such that a JMS direct request / response pattern works.
The reply-to topic is temporary so I would need wildcard logic such as t/reply/* subsriptions to have them routed over the bridge. Can someone point to a working example how to set this up?
Regards,
Harald

Tagged:

Answers

  • TomF
    TomF Member, Employee Posts: 412 Solace Employee
    #2

    Hi @Harald Hengelbrock , is there a reason why you aren't using the default reply-to topic? This has the advantage of doing all this hardwork for you. The disadvantage is that the reply is unicast. Do you need the reply to be sent to multiple destinations?

  • FalkLademann
    FalkLademann Member Posts: 8 ✭
    #3

    Hello,
    I'm working on a requirement for JMS strict request/reply with temporary response queue, to be bridged over VPNs, therefore would be interested in the outcome of this as well.
    JMS javax.jms.Session as well as com.solacesystems.jms.SolSession would not allow to provide a queue name on createTemporaryQueue (unlike with C#, VB, C++, JCSMP, Java RTO). Therefore the destination always is with an automatically-generated name. Would that internal names be bridgeable per se?
    Thanks
    Falk

Categories

This Month's Leaders

This Week's Leaders